Yawallac wrote:If that is true, that NSTRA now has a registry, then it is very conceivable that "NSTRA lines" will be developed.YES!
They have for years.... I'd dare say around 6-8 years now..
Yawallac wrote:If that is true, that NSTRA now has a registry, then it is very conceivable that "NSTRA lines" will be developed.YES!
I see from the NSTRA site that they do not require registration to participate in their trials. W/o required registration, why would anyone bother?They have for years.... I'd dare say around 6-8 years now..
Page 14 of the standard rules:Yawallac wrote:I see from the NSTRA site that they do not require registration to participate in their trials. W/o required registration, why would anyone bother?They have for years.... I'd dare say around 6-8 years now..
The only venue that CLJ competed in was NSTRA. He is an AF recognized champion from winning the Ralston Purina Endurance trial in 1998.Yawallac wrote:Vagas was referring to CLJ's pedigree, so my question was whether CLJ had won a recognized Championship that would show on his pedigree. That has nothing to do with what I recognize.In a venue you choose not to reconize.
You completely missed the point. Why would a breeder be interested in registering litters or owners be interested in registering dogs in a registry that did not require it's participants to register? What is the point of the registry? ...just to have one?Page 14 of the standard rules:
b. A dog must be eligible to be registered with a recognized registry to enter any NSTRA trial.
1. NSTRA recognizes the NSTRA, AKC, FDSB, and CKC registries. However, regardless of which registry is used, the dog must be eligible to be registered in the NSTRA registry as a recognized
pointing dog breed to be entered in any NSTRA trial.
2. Owners having dog registration pending will be responsible for completion of registration within
(30) days of placement.
3. No placements will be recorded until the registration number is forwarded to the National Office
(NSTRA, AKC, FDSB, CKC). After sixty (60) days, if no registration number has been received and/or verification that one exists, the placement will be void and all placements will be adjusted.
The American Field no longer recognizes NSTRA Championships, so I would be curious to know if his "CH" is still listed on pedigrees today. Does anyone have a current pedigree with CLJ on it that could answer that question?He is an AF recognized champion from winning the Ralston Purina Endurance trial in 1998.
As a breeder I would have to disagree, a registry is very important and not just a way of making money.Personally, a registry is nothing but a database with the purpose of making money.
I agree that a registry is important for tracking purposes and just that (and making money). My point is that no registry serves a higher purpose than another (e.g. AKC over AF, over UKC, etc.). Hence my statement that I use multiple registries and I would use others if it met my needs.Yawallac wrote:As a breeder I would have to disagree, a registry is very important and not just a way of making money.Personally, a registry is nothing but a database with the purpose of making money.
My point is that no registry serves a higher purpose than another (e.g. AKC over AF, over UKC, etc.).
As of last week Crow's Little Joe's AF number were 162-81-827Yawallac wrote:The American Field no longer recognizes NSTRA Championships, so I would be curious to know if his "CH" is still listed on pedigrees today. Does anyone have a current pedigree with CLJ on it that could answer that question?
Holy cow!!Crow's Little Joe's AF number were 162-81-827
Even this is understated. A registry is an absolute necessity for anyone breeding any purebred animal. And if we are to have one then we have to pay the people who do it for us. It is great that we have several that do a great job of keeping those records accurately and providing them to who ever needs them.Yawallac wrote:As a breeder I would have to disagree, a registry is very important and not just a way of making money.Personally, a registry is nothing but a database with the purpose of making money.